Microseismic Location in EGS: Comparing Picking-based and Source-imaging Workflows on Downhole DAS Data
- Key words
- enhanced geothermal systems, induced seismicity, microseismic monitoring, distributed acoustic sensing, phase picking, source imaging
- Conference
- Stanford Geothermal Workshop
- Year
- 2026
- Session
- FORGE
- Language
- English
- Paper number
- Zhang3
Full text
1104 KB, opens in a new tab
Abstract
Accurate microseismic locations are essential for developing and monitoring enhanced geothermal systems (EGS). Joint use of downhole geophones and distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) can boost detection and location performance, but conventional picking-based workflows perform sub-optimally on DAS data because individual channels are noisy. In addition, DAS’s unidirectional measurements cause blind spots that depend on acquisition geometry and source location, focal mechanism, and subsurface structure. We compare a traditional, picking-based locator with a picking-free source-imaging workflow that jointly exploits P- and S-wave phases on DAS and geophones. The source-imaging method applies an STA/LTA transform to enhance P-wave coherence and mitigate blind spots due to DAS directivity. Our analysis clarifies the strengths and downsides of each approach and shows that combining them improves catalog completeness and location accuracy and resolution, with specific benefits for real-time detection of shear onset and runaway slip. These results inform real-time monitoring, risk assessment, and stimulation planning in EGS operations.
Copyright 2026, Stanford Geothermal Program. Readers who download papers from this site should honour the copyright of the original authors, and may not copy or distribute the work further without the permission of the original publisher.