Conference Papers Database New search

Factors Controlling Rate and Magnitudes of Injection-Induced Earthquakes

Taeho KIM, Jean-Philippe AVOUAC

Key words
Induced Seismicity, Goethermal Stimulation
Conference
Stanford Geothermal Workshop
Year
2024
Session
Geophysics
Language
English
Paper number
Kim

Full text

2476 KB, opens in a new tab

Abstract

Advancements central to the world’s transition to a greener economy such as geothermal energy are hampered by a lack of understanding and control of the maximum magnitude event. We develop a physical model for induced seismicity rate and identify the dominant factors on induced event magnitudes from the data. Induced seismicity observed during Enhanced Geothermal Stimulation (EGS) at Otaniemi, Finland and the Basel Deep Heat Mining project are reproduced by a physical model based on pore pressure diffusion and rate-and-state friction. The physical models produce simulations closest to the observations when assuming rate-and-state friction for shear failure with a diffusivity matching the pressure build-up at the well-head at onset of injections. At the same time, pressure drawdown immediately following shut-ins is best modeled with a lower diffusivity, indicating a significant change in diffusivity through fracture opening and closure. Seismicity rate following shut-in in Basel also indicates slower diffusion mechanisms. The potential of the model to serve as a forecasting tool is demonstrated by a pseudo-forecast that closely matches the entire seismicity rate history, using only the first injection stage as the training period. Next, we focus on the magnitude-frequency distribution of seismicity and how they may correlate to the injections. We observe a dominant, negative correlation of the b-value and maximum magnitude to depth in Otaniemi, although we do not observe the same relationship in Basel. Following a correction of the magnitudes to de-trend the dependence on depth in Otaniemi, both catalogs show a positive correlation between maximum magnitude and cumulative injected volume. We also observe a similar non-linear relationship between the magnitude-frequency distribution and distance from the injection source for the two catalogs. The identification of factors controlling seismicity rate and magnitudes provides basis for a control and optimization framework that may be utilized for sophisticated design of injection schedules.

Copyright 2024, Stanford Geothermal Program. Readers who download papers from this site should honour the copyright of the original authors, and may not copy or distribute the work further without the permission of the original publisher.

Attend the next Stanford Geothermal Workshop. Workshop details
You have opened 0 records today from 216.73.216.139 (216.73.216.139).
Viewed 25 September 2026, 5:52 am.