Title: |
Seismotectonic Evolution and Geothermal Energy Production in the Salton Sea Geothermal Field |
Authors: |
Malcolm C. A. WHITE, Nori NAKATA, Verónica RODRÍGUEZ TRIBALDOS, Avinash NAYAK, and Patrick DOBSON |
Key Words: |
seismicity, migration, Salton Sea Geothermal Field, seismotectonics |
Conference: |
Stanford Geothermal Workshop |
Year: |
2023 |
Session: |
General |
Language: |
English |
Paper Number: |
White1 |
File Size: |
2225 KB |
View File: |
|
We seek a unified conceptual understanding of seismicity in the Salton Sea Geothermal Field (SSGF) that integrates the effects of geothermal energy production into the context of its seismotectonic evolution. The SSGF is one of the largest geothermal energy resources in the world, with enough estimated power potential to supply more than 1.4 million homes with sustainable energy. It is also a potential major source of lithium, an increasingly valuable energy store. Located in the step-over region between the southern terminus of the San Andreas fault to the east and the northern terminus of the Imperial fault to the west, the SSGF occupies a pull-apart basin where crustal thinning enables upward migration of mantle-derived magma, which drives the circulation of geothermal brine in shallow sediments roughly 2 to 4 km beneath Earth’s surface. Geothermal energy production in the SSGF began in 1982, and 11 commercial plants operate today. Previous studies exploring the causal relationship between geothermal energy production and background seismicity rates in the SSGF by Brodsky and Lajoie (2013) and Trugman et al. (2016) came to somewhat incongruous conclusions. We now seek to clarify the degree to which human activity influences seismicity in the SSGF. To do so, we compare background seismicity rates over the past 50 years with the available history of production and injection activity at wells associated with geothermal energy production. We contextualize the seismicity that occurs within the transtensional tectonic setting in which the SSGF is situated. We observe distinct spatiotemporal seismicity patterns, some of which are most easily understood as part of the long-term seismotectonic evolution of the SSGF, and others that are more easily explained by the movement of shallow fluids. We assess the statistical significance of simple linear models relating pump activity to background seismicity rates. In this paper, we will document our findings. Brodsky, E. E., & Lajoie, L. J. (2013). Science, 341(6145), 543–546. doi: 10.1126/science.1239213 Trugman, D. T., Shearer, P. M., Borsa, A. A., & Fialko, Y. (2016). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 121(1), 225–247. doi: 10.1002/2015JB012510
Press the Back button in your browser, or search again.
Copyright 2023, Stanford Geothermal Program: Readers who download papers from this site should honor the copyright of the original authors and may not copy or distribute the work further without the permission of the original publisher.
Attend the nwxt Stanford Geothermal Workshop,
click here for details.