Title: |
Physical Model of a Fractured Reservoir |
Authors: |
L.C. Hull, K.N. Koslow |
Conference: |
Stanford Geothermal Workshop |
Year: |
1983 |
Session: |
Injection |
Language: |
English |
File Size: |
379KB |
View File: |
|
The objectives of the physical modeling effort are to: (1) evaluate injection-backflow testing for fractured reservoirs under conditions of known reservoir parameters (porosity, fracture width, etc.); (2) study the mechanisms controlling solute transport in fracture systems; and ( 3 ) provide data for validation of numerical models that explicitly simulate solute migration in fracture systems. The fracture network is 0.57-m wide, 1.7-m long, and consists of two sets of fractures at right angles to one another with a fracture spacing of 10.2 cm. A series of injection-backflow tests, similar to those performed at the Raft River Geothermal field, was conducted. These included variable volume injection and injection-backflow tests with varying quiescent periods between injection and backflow. This latter series of tests was conducted with a range of flow fields passing through the model. recovery is related to the flow field in the physical model and model parameters. Longer quiescent times and greater flow fields result in a lower tracer recovery. A plot of the fractional tracer recovery against quiescent time results in a straight line. This relationship, combined with classical reservoir engineering data, can be used to predict aquifer flow rate and porosity from known injection volumes and tracer recovery.
Press the Back button in your browser, or search again.
Copyright 1983, Stanford Geothermal Program: Readers who download papers from this site should honor the copyright of the original authors and may not copy or distribute the work further without the permission of the original publisher.
Attend the nwxt Stanford Geothermal Workshop,
click here for details.