Conference Papers Database New search

Spatial Correlation of Well Performance

Malcolm A. Grant

Key words
proving, well performance
Location
Kawerau, New Zealand; Ohaaki, New Zealand; Taupo Volcanic Zone
Conference
Stanford Geothermal Workshop
Year
2006
Session
Reservoir Engineering
Language
English
Paper number
Grant

Full text

63KB, opens in a new tab

Abstract

Defining the area of a geothermal field by drilling raises the question of how densely need the wells be drilled? Given a successful well, how large an area around it can be regarded as productive? This is similar to the proving of a mineral deposit, except that permeability in a geothermal field is typically very random, compared to relatively smooth variation of an ore deposit. Well performance depends primarily on two factors, temperature and permeability. Temperature varies relatively smoothly, but permeability can be highly heterogeneous. Standard geostatistical methods were applied to well success at Kawerau. All wells greater than 500m depth were used. Semivariograms were constructed for three statistics: steam flow at 7 bar gauge, Injectivity and well success. Well success was defined as 1 if the well was commercial, 0 if it was not.

At Kawerau, well success and injectivity are correlated over short distances, 100m or less, whereas well flow is correlated up to 500m. This latter reflects the effect of temperature - a high well flow requires high temperature, which in turn implies high temperatures within several hundred metres, improving the likely steam flow within that distance. Permeability is random over distances greater than 100m.

Copyright 2006, Stanford Geothermal Program. Readers who download papers from this site should honour the copyright of the original authors, and may not copy or distribute the work further without the permission of the original publisher.

Attend the next Stanford Geothermal Workshop. Workshop details
You have opened 0 records today from 216.73.216.139 (216.73.216.139).
Viewed 30 September 2026, 5:30 pm.