Conference Papers Database New search

Hybrid Ground-Source Heat Pumps for Cooling Cellular Tower Shelters: from Campus Living Laboratory to Nationwide Deployment

Gloria Andrea AGUIRRE, Koenraad F. BECKERS, Maciej Z. LUKAWSKI, and Jefferson W. TESTER

Key words
ground-source (geothermal) heat pumps, air-source heat pumps, alternative cooling systems, cellular towers, techno-economic and environmental modeling, systems engineering
Conference
Stanford Geothermal Workshop
Year
2017
Session
Low Temperature
Language
English
Paper number
Aguirre

Full text

1194 KB, opens in a new tab

Abstract

Tens of thousands of cellular towers are in operation across the U.S. Most of the cell towers are accompanied by a small shelter that houses electrical equipment continuously generating around 8 kWth of heat. The annual electricity bill for cooling these shelters with conventional air-source heat pump (ASHP) systems and their corresponding carbon footprint are significant. This paper presents methodology and results of techno-economic and environmental modeling of five different cooling configurations for shelters located across various states with different climates. The five configurations include: case 1: ground-source heat pumps (GSHP)-only; case 2: GSHP + air economizer (AE); case 3: GSHP + dry-cooler (DC); case 4: ASHP-only (business as usual – BAU); and case 5: ASHP + AE. With no consideration of incentives or rebates, base case results show that the total cost of ownership (TCO) for all configurations is the lowest for states located in cooler climatic regions (e.g., Maine, Minnesota, Colorado), and the highest for states located in warmer climatic regions (e.g., California, Florida). The configuration with the lowest overall TCO is case 5: ASHP + AE, and the highest is case 1: GSHP-only. Furthermore, the configuration with the lowest lifetime electricity consumption and CO2e emissions is case 2: GSHP + AE, and the highest is case 4: ASHP-only. With the use of energy-efficient GSHP systems, regions with high electricity prices and consumption will experience lower costs and environmental impacts from a reduction in operating conditions over the lifetime of the system (20 years). It is expected that the prospect of GSHP systems will be more favorable in the future than in today’s economy when incentives and rebates, increasing electricity prices, and carbon taxes are considered.

Copyright 2017, Stanford Geothermal Program. Readers who download papers from this site should honour the copyright of the original authors, and may not copy or distribute the work further without the permission of the original publisher.

Attend the next Stanford Geothermal Workshop. Workshop details
You have opened 0 records today from 216.73.217.92 (216.73.217.92).
Viewed 8 October 2026, 8:04 pm.