Conference Papers Database New search

Induced Seismicity Monitoring Tools for the Geothermal Environment

Leidig, Mark; Reiter, Delaine; Ferris, Aaron; Rodi, William

Key words
Geothermal; induced seismicity; enhanced geothermal systems (EGS); geophysics; injection; event detection; reservoir characterization
Location
The Geysers, California
Conference
Geothermal Resources Council Transactions
Year
2011
Session
Induced seismicity
Language
English

Full text

Open the paper

Opens in a new tab

Abstract

The monitoring of induced seismicity has become an important objective as geothermal and other energy production operations have moved closer to population areas. Fluids withdrawn from or injected into the subsurface cause changes in the local stress field, which can result in the generation of earthquakes, either on new or pre-existing faults. Examples of such earthquake activity include The Geysers geothermal field, where induced seismicity has occurred for decades, the 2008-2009 earthquake swarms near the Dallas/Ft. Worth airport, and the 2010-2011 earthquake swarms in central Arkansas, possibly including a magnitude 4.7 event. The latter two examples are likely attributed to fault reactivation from subsurface water injection. The majority of seismic monitoring tools were developed for regional and teleseismic distances. Without adaptation, these tools are not well suited for the small-scale heterogeneity and the higher frequency content data observed at the reservoir scale. In order to monitor for and possibly prevent unwanted induced seismicity, it is necessary to develop new or adapt and refine existing tools. An initial step in monitoring for induced seismicity is to develop a seismic velocity model. We have adapted a regional scale joint inversion technique that includes important reservoir scale features such as travel-time prediction methods that are not limited to layered structures or surface receivers and 3-D nonlinear velocity tomography with geostatistical constraints. To aid development of a starting model for the inversion, we investigated the use of a passive seismic technique known as seismic noise tomography, a method traditionally employed at regional distances to calibrate the velocity model between two stations. We developed an event detection algorithm specifically designed to identify small seismic signals in noisy data. Event locations are then determined by a specially modified version of the Grid-Search Multiple Event Location (GMEL) software originally developed to locate nuclear testing around the world. In this paper, we present the development of this software and examples of its application on induced seismicity data sets.

Copyright 2011, Geothermal Resources Council. Readers who download papers from this site should honour the copyright of the original authors, and may not copy or distribute the work further without the permission of the original publisher.

Attend the 2026 Geothermal Rising Conference. Meeting details
You have opened 0 records today from 216.73.216.61 (216.73.216.61).
Viewed 10 October 2026, 3:08 am.