Conference Papers Database New search

Unit 14 / Sulphur Springs H2S Abatement Process Screening and Stretford Improvements Study--Part 3

Benn, Brian; McIntush, Kenneth E.; Beitler, Carrie Ann M.; Mamrosh, Darryl L.; Hileman, O. E.

Key words
Geothermal; noncondensable gas; NCG; The Geysers; H2S abatement; Stretford; hydrogen sulfide removal; sulfur recovery
Location
The Geysers, California
Conference
Geothermal Resources Council Transactions
Year
2012
Session
Effluent abatement; Hydrogen sulfide; Equipment design; Scru
Language
English

Full text

Open the paper

Opens in a new tab

Abstract

Presented in this report are the results of Part 3 of a three-part study performed in 2007. The major goal of the study was to improve the primary H2S abatement system at the Sulphur Springs (Unit 14) Power Plant owned by Calpine Corporation and located at The Geysers. The existing Stretford system is approximately 30 years old and is now under-loaded due to reduced NCG, which was a result of Geysers Recharge water injection. The following three questions were investigated in the 2007 study: Part 1) Is replacement of the existing Stretford system economically advantageous, given the availability of modern, environmentally-friendly gas treatment technology that could handle the current low sulfur load with a much smaller footprint and less parasitic power load? [An article that was focused on Part 1 was presented at the 2010 GRC Annual Meeting in Sacramento, CA (Benn et al., 2010).] Part 2) In lieu of replacing the Stretford system, what operational mprovements can be made to the existing system to reduce the total cost of treatment? [An article that was focused on Part 2 was presented at the 2011 GRC Annual Meeting in San Diego, CA (Benn et al., 2011).] Part 3) What physical modifications can be made to the Stretford system to reduce process shutdowns caused by sulfur plugging? [Part 3 is the basis of this article.] The primary conclusions of the study are: i) every alternative technology considered proved to have a higher total treatment cost than continuing with the existing Stretford unit, even if no improvements are made, and even though it is operating at ~10% of original design loading; and ii) significant reductions in total treatment cost should be possible by implementing several recommended improvements described in Part 2 and Part 3 of this work.

Copyright 2012, Geothermal Resources Council. Readers who download papers from this site should honour the copyright of the original authors, and may not copy or distribute the work further without the permission of the original publisher.

Attend the 2026 Geothermal Rising Conference. Meeting details
You have opened 0 records today from 216.73.217.92 (216.73.217.92).
Viewed 24 September 2026, 1:27 pm.