I believe that PhD students should take a major role in formulating
their PhD research topics. An essential part of PhD training is figuring
out what’s worth doing, how to do it, and bringing it to completion.
My fondest hope is that by the time my PhD students are done, they will
have taught me a bunch of stuff I didn’t know before. I’ve
been fortunate enough that most of my grad students have fulfilled that
hope. I don’t run a big lab, I don’t have postdocs, and
I’m not a micromanager, so students who are happiest as my advisees
are self-starters who enjoy working with group members who aren’t
working on exactly what they are. That said, I have a scheduled weekly
meeting with each student so they can get advice and I can get my intellectual
batteries recharged by talking to them about their research.
The most successful of my students have been those who took advantage
of the expertise of some of the other faculty in the School of Earth
Sciences, as well as mine. These faculty include Elizabeth Miller (tectonics
and extensional magmatism), Joe Wooden (U-Pb geochronology, radiogenic
isotopes), Mike McWilliams (40Ar/39Ar geochronology), Norm Sleep (quantifying
anything you can think of), Dave Pollard and Paul Segall (rock mechanics
and structural geology as applied to volcano deformation), Don Lowe
(after all, volcanology is just hot and fast sedimentology), and Marco
Einaudi (ore deposits, now Emeritus). We’ve also recently started
collaborating with faculty in the Archaeology Program: Ian Hodder, Ian
Morris, and John Rick. One of the nice attributes of Stanford is that,
for the most part, the barriers to graduate students working between
faculty and between departments are low.
Some of the best field-based igneous petrologist and volcanologists
in the world are employed at the U.S. Geological Survey just a 10-minute
drive away in Menlo Park. These include Charlie Bacon, Mike Clynne,
Julie Donelly-Nolan, Wes Hildreth (my spouse), David John, Jake Lowenstern
(a former student of mine and now the Scientist-in-Charge at the Yellowstone
Volcano Observatory), and Tom Sisson, as well as some retired but still-active
people (Bob Christiansen, Pete Lipman, Jim Moore, Pat Muffler). Although
they don’t supervise students directly, they can provide a wealth
of expertise about volcanoes, including the Cascades and Aleutian chains,
Long Valley and Yellowstone calderas, Tertiary calderas of the Great
Basin and the Rockies, and Hawaii, and about magma chamber processes
and the granites that are left behind.
In deciding where to go to graduate school, one of the most important
criteria is the quality of your fellow graduate students. The faculty
are important, but you’ll learn as much or more from your fellow
graduate students. After all, they are the ones you’ll be spending
your time with at 2 a.m., running a mass spectrometer or printing out
a conference poster. I hope you’ll look at the web pages of current
grad students at Stanford, both mine and others, to get a sense of what
they are doing. And if you visit Stanford, make sure to make time to
talk to a range of graduate students so you get a balanced view of the
department and school.
A good predictor of whether you’ll be satisfied with your graduate
education is whether your PhD advisor has a track record of placing
students in the types of jobs you imagine yourself holding once you
graduate. In that spirit I offer a list of my advisees through the years.